Evaluation

Home Introduction Task Process Related Links Evaluation Conclusion Chart Page

 

 

Not Yet Meeting Expectations

1

Beginning to Meet

Expectations

2

 

Meeting

Expectations

        3

Exceeding

Expectations

4

Score

Quality of Content

Content  lacks facts and contains few if any supporting materials (charts, graphs, pictures); no bibliography.

Content provides some facts and supporting materials (graphs, charts, pictures) and bibliography. 

Content is good and contains many facts and supporting materials (graphs, charts, pictures) and bibliography.

Content is comprehensive and accurate  containing lots of facts and supporting materials(graphs, charts, pictures) and bibliography.

 

Research

 Plan

Information is poorly organized and paragraphed.

Information is generally organized, but no headings are used.  Poor paragraphs. 

Information is  organized with headings but some material is out of place.  Good paragraphs. 

Information is well organized with headings that clearly relate to the material.  Well paragraphed.  

 

Mechanics

Many grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. 

Five or more grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

Few grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

No  grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors.

 

Originality

Uses other people’s ideas but does not give them credit. No connections or inferences

Uses other people’s ideas (giving them credit) but there is almost no evidence of original thinking. Few connections or inferences.

Product shows some original thought.  Work shows new ideas and insights.  Good connections and inferences.

Product shows a large amount of original thought.  Ideas are creative and inventive. Connections and inferences relate directly to the topic.

 

Presentation

Content presented poorly; elements included are disorganized, incomplete and/or unclear in purpose.

Presentation contains elements that are unnecessary; doesn’t present content well.

Presentation contains good elements though some may detract from the clarity of the content.

 Presentation is attractive, easy to follow, and presents ideas clearly and concisely. 

 

    

                                                                              Evaluating Oral Presentations/Reports

 

Name: _____________________________________________ Class: ______________________ Date: ________________________

 

Title of Presentation/Reports: _______________________________________________________________________________________________

 

Dependent       Limited          Adequate      Competent       Proficient         Superior       WEIGHTING

CONTENT CRITERIA:

 

Quality of Ideas

 

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

 

 

·       clarity of thesis

·       depth and complexity of

analysis

·       originality of insights

 

Comments:

 

 

Organization of Material

 

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

 

 

·       clarity and coherence

·       logical sequencing of

ideas/information

 

Comments:

 

 

Research and Preparation

 

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

 

 

·       thorough research

·       thoughtful preparation

·       accuracy of information

·       use of information to support opinions

 

Comments:

 

DELIVERY CRITERIA:

 

Voice

 

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

 

 

·       clarity, tone, volume

 

Comments:

 

 

 

Language

 

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

 

 

·       appropriateness of diction

and register

·       fluency, enunciation, clarity

of expression

·       use of rhetorical devices

·       mechanics

 

Comments:

 

 

Audience Awareness

 

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

 

 

·       enthusiasm, sensitivity to audience

·       appropriate body language and mannerisms

·       audience participation

 

Comments:

 

 

Commitment and Effort

 

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 

 

 

·       professionalism of presentation

·       commitment of time

·       creativity

 

Comments:

 

 

TOTAL: